How to solve the problem of empty luxury seats at the new Yankee Stadium
The last few days I, and a good chunk of my colleagues, and my wife, and my wife’s colleagues, have been at the Media in Transition conference at MIT. There’s lots available online now about the conference proceedings, including podcasts that I’ve posted at the CMS website, but right now I want to pass on a thought I had at the conference while in the hard-core thinking mode at the same time that I passed a TV with the Sox/Yankees game on…
The new Yankee Stadium is getting slammed for its field-level luxury seating, which in this economy is ridiculously overpriced and is thus largely empty:
What I’m wondering is, why hasn’t sports adopted an adjustable pricing system for their seats? There’s the now relatively common model of eBay-style auctioning—that seems like a no-brainer and could be easily implemented for buying those seats online.
But for the Yankees’ situation, and really for any event that’s running a risk of not getting a butt in every seat, what about a physical, in-person auction at the stadium ticket booths?
Here’s what I imagine…
Some of those empty seats at Yankee Stadium cost $2500. On gameday, the Yankees organization knows those seats will stay empty. So outside the stadium before the game, they should set up parallel lines based on how much people would be willing to pay for those seats.
Line 1: $2000
Line 2: $1500
Line 3: $1000
Line 4: $500
Line 5: $100
People then queue up half an hour before the game. Whoever is willing to pay the most—those in Line 1–get first dibs. Anyone who thinks, “Psh, I’ll just lowball the Yankees and stand in Line 5″ runs the risk of losing available seats to people who go ahead and pay more.
This system would also encourage people to pay what they’re really willing to pay—because it’s a line. Changing one’s mind would mean going to the back of another line.
I see this as a fair, progressive way to sell seats that would otherwise remain empty due to overpricing.



