<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fungible Convictions &#187; giles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fungibleconvictions.com/tag/giles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fungibleconvictions.com</link>
	<description>The blog of Andrew Whitacre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Giles/CBS Sunday Morning report also violated copyright</title>
		<link>http://fungibleconvictions.com/2009/04/12/nancy-gilescbs-sunday-morning-report-also-violated-copyright/</link>
		<comments>http://fungibleconvictions.com/2009/04/12/nancy-gilescbs-sunday-morning-report-also-violated-copyright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Whitacre</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fungibleconvictions.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Dan Gillmor, I learn that not only was Nancy Giles&#8217; report on Twitter just excruciatingly awful journalism, it also violated someone else&#8217;s copyright by featuring a large chunk of the video &#8220;Twitter in Plain English&#8221;: while the duration of the video&#8217;s use presumably fell within fair use, proper attribution was entirely lacking. In fact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://twitter.com/dangillmor/status/1503791096">Dan Gillmor</a>, I learn that not only was <a href="http://fungibleconvictions.com/2009/03/29/cbs-nancy-gilescbs-nancy-giles/">Nancy Giles&#8217; report on Twitter</a> just excruciatingly awful journalism, it also<a href="http://www.commoncraft.com/our-twitter-video-used-mainstream-media-thoughts"> violated someone else&#8217;s copyright</a> by featuring a large chunk of the video <a href="http://www.commoncraft.com/twitter">&#8220;Twitter in Plain English&#8221;</a>: while the duration of the video&#8217;s use presumably fell within fair use, proper attribution was entirely lacking. In fact, the voiceover from the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4901026n">CBS report</a> implicitly attributes &#8220;Twitter in Plain English&#8221; to Twitter itself, when in fact it was made by someone else.</p>
<p>So again, not only did Giles not bother to do research on how Twitter actually works and how it&#8217;s actually used, she and the rest of the production staff didn&#8217;t bother to do an acceptable job on the research they <em>did</em> do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fungibleconvictions.com/2009/04/12/nancy-gilescbs-sunday-morning-report-also-violated-copyright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

